????

?????
??? ??-S?
????

??????

? ? ? ? ? ? ?

????

+ ????
+ ????

????

Otherwhere

Anywhere

?????3300


??

?

Plateaus in eyes, I am never here. ........................................© 2005-2006 by ??

??

The end

???????????????msn space???

http://spaces.msn.com/neverhere/

- ??? ?? 2006?03?19?, ??? 22:27? ???2? |? ???0?

???

????????????

??????????????????????????????????????

???????????

- ??? ?? 2006?03?16?, ??? 00:01? ???3? |? ???0?

????

??????????????????

????????????????????????????

- ??? ?? 2006?03?6?, ??? 00:44? ???0? |? ???0?

??????

Foucault?Deleuze?Guattari??Anti-Oedipus (published in 1972 in French, 1983 in English)???????

Anti-Oedipus??????????????????????????????(introduction to the Non-Fascist Life)?

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Last but not lest, the major enemy, the strategic adversary is fascism. And not only historical fascism, the fascism of Hitler and Mussolini - which was able to mobilize and use the desire of the masses so effectively - but also the fascism in us all, in our heads and in our everday behavior, the fascism that causes us to love power, to desire the very thing that dominates and exploits us.

- ??? ?? 2006?02?25?, ??? 22:52? ???2? |? ???0?

Brokeback Mountain

It is exactly a good film, with a kind of slow deepness.

It received awards again now, in the British Academy Film Awards (BAFTAs), including Best film, Best supporting actor, Best director, Adapted screenplay as well.

Lee Ang is a great director. I think it should be difficult for a chinese director to go through the deepness of American culture, but he did, and did well.  In contrast to Ang, Zhang Yimou just likes a kid.

- ??? ?? 2006?02?20?, ??? 19:36? ???1? |? ???0?

Book: Building A Revolution

At a first glance, it is not as poor as its cover design. It looks like an overview of the state of contemporary chinese architecture. The approch sounds a bit of "structuralist". However, it might be difficult to discuss chinese stuffs by this way, personally, I think. It also should be difficult to set some kind of "Evaluating Criteria". Or, we can ask: For WHO? For WHAT? And WHY? Ideology, consumption, media, despot......are all matters there, but never "the all" at the same time. What's "the all" then? Rhizome?

http://www.hkupress.org/asp/bookinfo.asp?PD_NUM=9622097448

Charlie Q.L. Xue (2005), Building A Revolution: Chinese Architecture Since 1980, Hong Kong University Press.

Contents:

1. The Evaluating Criteria for Contemporary Chinese Architecture

2. ?National Form? and Chinese Identities ? Burden or Chance

3. The Impact of International Architecture and Future Trends

4. Survival strategies -- Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou

5. Urban Design as a Tool for Better Living

6. Form Follows Policies -- the Evolution of China?s Housing Since 1978

7.  Portraits of Chinese Architects

8. Experimental Architecture -  Rising of the Younger Generation

9. Behind the Building Revolution ? Unleashed Private Practice

10. Chinese Architecture in the 21st Century ? An Epilogue

Appendix I Chronicle of Chinese Architecture since

Appendix II Architectural Education and Publication

- ??? ?? 2006?02?4?, ??? 01:14? ???1? |? ???0?

????

???????????

??S??????????????S???????????????????????

????????????Nando's????????????????????

??S?????????????Master??????????????????????????????????50%??????????????????????????

?????????????????????????????

- ??? ?? 2006?01?31?, ??? 00:46? ???1? |? ???0?

Chinese new year

2006,

Dog bless China.

- ??? ?? 2006?01?29?, ??? 23:04? ???0? |? ???0?

Translucency

????????Alex Hartley??????????????????????????

???????translucency??????????space, depth, perspective?????

???????????????????????????????

http://www.victoria-miro.com/artists/14,biog/

Pavilion, 2000
Back lit inkjet image on PVC, satin acid etched glass, fluorescent tubes, steel, limestone, aluminium
7.62 x 3.79 x 2.96 metres
Winner of Sculpture at Goodwood ART2000 Prize. View of installation at Goodwood Sculpture Park

Untitled (Installation), 2003
mixed media
972 x 256 x 357cm

Four Part Division, 2004
MDF, satin etched glass, b & w photograph
200 x 110 x 36cm

- ??? ?? 2006?01?24?, ??? 06:35? ???1? |? ???0?